0.00/0.09	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.09	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.09/0.28	% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
0.09/0.28	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.28	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.28	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.28	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.28	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.09/0.28	% WCLimit    : 180
0.09/0.28	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 09:25:53 EDT 2024
0.09/0.28	% CPUTime    : 
0.14/0.38	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.14/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EvoT51Vtoj/E---3.1_13940.p
0.14/0.49	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.14/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA.
0.14/0.49	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.49	# Starting pre_casc_4 with 720s (4) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting sh10 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho9 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho8 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# post_as_ho8 with pid 14077 completed with status 0
0.14/0.49	# Result found by post_as_ho8
0.14/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA.
0.14/0.49	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.49	# Starting pre_casc_4 with 720s (4) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting sh10 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho9 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho8 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
0.14/0.49	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSMMFBN
0.14/0.49	# partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSMMSBN
0.14/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 94s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 14103 completed with status 0
0.14/0.49	# Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
0.14/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMLLLCHSA.
0.14/0.49	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.49	# Starting pre_casc_4 with 720s (4) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting sh10 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho9 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho8 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
0.14/0.49	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSMMFBN
0.14/0.49	# partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSMMSBN
0.14/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.49	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 94s (1) cores
0.14/0.49	# Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
0.14/0.49	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.14/0.49	
0.14/0.49	# Proof found!
0.14/0.49	# SZS status Theorem
0.14/0.49	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_22, type, is_of: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_23, type, all_of: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_25, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_77, type, e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_124, type, n_is: $i > $i > $o).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_162, type, n_ts: $i > $i > $i).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_189, type, frac: $i).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_191, type, num: $i > $i).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_192, type, den: $i > $i).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_193, type, n_eq: $i > $i > $o).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_198, type, n_pf: $i > $i > $i).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_199, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_200, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.14/0.49	thf(decl_201, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.14/0.49	thf(def_e_is, axiom, ((e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(((X60)=(X61))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EvoT51Vtoj/E---3.1_13940.p', def_e_is)).
0.14/0.49	thf(def_all_of, axiom, ((all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((is_of @ X4 @ X3)=>(X2 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EvoT51Vtoj/E---3.1_13940.p', def_all_of)).
0.14/0.49	thf(def_is_of, axiom, ((is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:((X2 @ X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EvoT51Vtoj/E---3.1_13940.p', def_is_of)).
0.14/0.49	thf(def_n_eq, axiom, ((n_eq)=(^[X1:$i, X218:$i]:((n_is @ (n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X218)) @ (n_ts @ (num @ X218) @ (den @ X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EvoT51Vtoj/E---3.1_13940.p', def_n_eq)).
0.14/0.49	thf(def_n_is, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EvoT51Vtoj/E---3.1_13940.p', def_n_is)).
0.14/0.49	thf(satz62b, conjecture, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ frac))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X472:$i]:((in @ X472 @ frac))) @ (^[X473:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ frac))) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((n_eq @ X1 @ X473)=>(n_eq @ (n_pf @ X1 @ X4) @ (n_pf @ X473 @ X4)))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EvoT51Vtoj/E---3.1_13940.p', satz62b)).
0.14/0.49	thf(satz56, axiom, (all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1 @ frac))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X282:$i]:((in @ X282 @ frac))) @ (^[X283:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4 @ frac))) @ (^[X4:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X10:$i]:((in @ X10 @ frac))) @ (^[X10:$i]:(((n_eq @ X1 @ X283)=>((n_eq @ (n_pf @ X1 @ X4) @ (n_pf @ X283 @ X10))<=(n_eq @ X4 @ X10))))))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EvoT51Vtoj/E---3.1_13940.p', satz56)).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((e_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i, Z2:$i]:(((Z1)=(Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((is_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i > $o]:((Z1 @ Z0)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_10, plain, ((n_eq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((((n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1))=(n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_n_eq])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_11, axiom, ((n_is)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:(((Z0)=(Z1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, c_0_7])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_12, plain, ((all_of)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:((((Z0 @ X4))=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_13, plain, ((n_eq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i, Z1:$i]:((((n_ts @ (num @ Z0) @ (den @ Z1))=(n_ts @ (num @ Z1) @ (den @ Z0))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~(![X568:$i]:(((in @ X568 @ frac)=>![X567:$i]:(((in @ X567 @ frac)=>![X566:$i]:(((in @ X566 @ frac)=>(((n_ts @ (num @ X568) @ (den @ X567))=(n_ts @ (num @ X567) @ (den @ X568)))=>((n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ X568 @ X566)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ X567 @ X566)))=(n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ X567 @ X566)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ X568 @ X566)))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz62b])]), c_0_12]), c_0_13])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X578:$i]:(((in @ X578 @ frac)=>![X577:$i]:(((in @ X577 @ frac)=>![X576:$i]:(((in @ X576 @ frac)=>![X575:$i]:(((in @ X575 @ frac)=>(((n_ts @ (num @ X578) @ (den @ X577))=(n_ts @ (num @ X577) @ (den @ X578)))=>(((n_ts @ (num @ X576) @ (den @ X575))=(n_ts @ (num @ X575) @ (den @ X576)))=>((n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ X578 @ X576)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ X577 @ X575)))=(n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ X577 @ X575)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ X578 @ X576)))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz56]), c_0_12]), c_0_13])])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ((in @ esk1_0 @ frac)&((in @ esk2_0 @ frac)&((in @ esk3_0 @ frac)&(((n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0))=(n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0)))&((n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)))!=(n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0)))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X830:$i, X831:$i, X832:$i, X833:$i]:((~(in @ X830 @ frac)|(~(in @ X831 @ frac)|(~(in @ X832 @ frac)|(~(in @ X833 @ frac)|(((n_ts @ (num @ X830) @ (den @ X831))!=(n_ts @ (num @ X831) @ (den @ X830)))|(((n_ts @ (num @ X832) @ (den @ X833))!=(n_ts @ (num @ X833) @ (den @ X832)))|((n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ X830 @ X832)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ X831 @ X833)))=(n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ X831 @ X833)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ X830 @ X832))))))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)))!=(n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X6:$i, X5:$i]:((((n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ X1 @ X5)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ X4 @ X6)))=(n_ts @ (num @ (n_pf @ X4 @ X6)) @ (den @ (n_pf @ X1 @ X5))))|~((in @ X1 @ frac))|~((in @ X4 @ frac))|~((in @ X5 @ frac))|~((in @ X6 @ frac))|((n_ts @ (num @ X1) @ (den @ X4))!=(n_ts @ (num @ X4) @ (den @ X1)))|((n_ts @ (num @ X5) @ (den @ X6))!=(n_ts @ (num @ X6) @ (den @ X5))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ((n_ts @ (num @ esk1_0) @ (den @ esk2_0))=(n_ts @ (num @ esk2_0) @ (den @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk3_0 @ frac), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk2_0 @ frac), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk1_0 @ frac), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.14/0.49	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_20]), c_0_21]), c_0_22]), c_0_23])]), ['proof']).
0.14/0.49	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.14/0.49	# Parsed axioms                        : 583
0.14/0.49	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 446
0.14/0.49	# Initial clauses                      : 156
0.14/0.49	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
0.14/0.49	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 144
0.14/0.49	# Processed clauses                    : 321
0.14/0.49	# ...of these trivial                  : 5
0.14/0.49	# ...subsumed                          : 50
0.14/0.49	# ...remaining for further processing  : 266
0.14/0.49	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 13
0.14/0.49	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.14/0.49	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.14/0.49	# Backward-rewritten                   : 6
0.14/0.49	# Generated clauses                    : 793
0.14/0.49	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 732
0.14/0.49	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.14/0.49	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.14/0.49	# Paramodulations                      : 756
0.14/0.49	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.14/0.49	# NegExts                              : 0
0.14/0.49	# Equation resolutions                 : 19
0.14/0.49	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.14/0.49	# Total rewrite steps                  : 368
0.14/0.49	# ...of those cached                   : 286
0.14/0.49	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.14/0.49	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.14/0.49	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.14/0.49	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.14/0.49	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.14/0.49	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.14/0.49	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.14/0.49	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.14/0.49	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.14/0.49	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.14/0.49	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.14/0.49	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.14/0.49	# Current number of processed clauses  : 140
0.14/0.49	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 58
0.14/0.49	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.14/0.49	#    Negative unit clauses             : 9
0.14/0.49	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 73
0.14/0.49	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 640
0.14/0.49	# ...number of literals in the above   : 2708
0.14/0.49	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.14/0.49	# Current number of archived clauses   : 115
0.14/0.49	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8017
0.14/0.49	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1589
0.14/0.49	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 41
0.14/0.49	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 154
0.14/0.49	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.14/0.49	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 19
0.14/0.49	# BW rewrite match successes           : 6
0.14/0.49	# Condensation attempts                : 321
0.14/0.49	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.14/0.49	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 66113
0.14/0.49	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 16986
0.14/0.49	
0.14/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.49	# User time                : 0.038 s
0.14/0.49	# System time              : 0.010 s
0.14/0.49	# Total time               : 0.049 s
0.14/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 5288 pages
0.14/0.49	
0.14/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.49	# User time                : 0.049 s
0.14/0.49	# System time              : 0.012 s
0.14/0.49	# Total time               : 0.061 s
0.14/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 2784 pages
0.14/0.49	% E---3.1 exiting
0.14/0.49	% E exiting
0.14/0.49	EOF